How Does Tumblr Even Work

I Just Don't Know (beautiful icon by Vextera) [18+]
  • Characters
  • ask me anything
  • rss
  • archive
  • cpunkhobie:

    worldweaverofmediocrity:

    cpunkhobie:

    a tweet from Twitter user DiscussingFilm: "'BEYOND THE SPIDER-VERSE' has been delayed indefinitely. See what other movies just got delayed: (link.)" attached is an image of Miles Morales doing an action pose, in front of a New York City skylineALT

    WIN !

    why win?

    The original release date was 9 months after atsv which was a.) impossible to achieve b.) even trying to reach that date would be extremely traumatic for the workers

    The “delayed indefinitely” just means it’s delayed for an unknown amount of time, due to the strikes. Since the voice actors and other staff are incapable of working on the movie until the strikes are finished

    (via threefeline)

    • 54 minutes ago
    • 25032 notes
    • #the audience can wait the workers deserve their fair cut
  • leupagus:

    spongebobssquarepants:

    image

    I grew up around these people and I absolutely knew what was going to happen next

    (via fluffiest-moth-in-existence)

    • 56 minutes ago
    • 13941 notes
    • #i too knew what was going to happen
  • bethanythebogwitch:

    The AUDACITY of venus fly traps to expect pollinators to help them reproduce after spending all their time eating bugs

    image

    (via fluffiest-moth-in-existence)

    • 1 hour ago
    • 1683 notes
  • homunculus-argument:

    Idea for a Generic Medieval Fantasy Setting: The characters refer to their nameday as an apparent stand-in for birthdays, celebrating it annually according to their respective preferences and perhaps family customs, as one does. People talk about things that happened before someone’s time as having gone down “before you were named”, someone grievously insults an opponent on the battlefield by going “your mother should never have named you.” So with the way naming is always talked about, as a reader you start to somewhat assume from context clues that these people have some sort of a taboo about the word “birth” or something, and naming is used as some sort of an euphenism to avoid naming the process in which people come into the world.

    Then somewhere halfway through the story it turns out that in this setting, people aren’t named immediately after being born. This is a semi-realistic-gritty fantasy setting, after all. Due to the somewhat high infant mortality, to at least somewhat soften the blow of potentially losing a child, babies just aren’t named before the parents are pretty confident that the kid is going to survive. The naming ceremony is where a baby is officially aknowledged as an entire individual, a member of the family and a legally existing person, instead of just a gurgling extension of the mother who may or may not disappear from this world. And that timespan between birth and being named is - depending on the situation and the family - somewhere between 1-4 years.

    And suddenly the whole bunch of annoyingly-too-mature teenagers and other weird remarks about age start making sense in hindsight. The heroine protagonist who celebrated her 16th nameday at the start of the story is actually 19 years old. The wild difference in maturity between two characters who were both named the same year wasn’t just a difference in backgrounds, The Rich Idiot isn’t just rosy-cheeked and naive due to being sheltered growing up, but actually literally years younger than a peasant “of the same age”. A character who’s sickly and was frequently remarked to look much older than their years hasn’t just been harrowed by their illness, but was not named before the age of seven because their parents didn’t think they’d survive.

    (via quezycoatl)

    • 1 hour ago
    • 3593 notes
  • ampervadasz:

    (via soymikki)

    • 2 hours ago
    • 501 notes
  • childrenlastdawn:

    (via tokidokifish)

    • 2 hours ago
    • 5571 notes
  • sofhtie:

    image

    i don’t think I’m ever going to get over this line

    [ID: A two panel comic of a quote from Not Another DnD Podcast. The first drawing is a full body portrait of Beverly Toegold III. He wears dark green armor with shining gold detail, holding a shield in front of him and a sword in his other hand. He has dark brown skin and curly black hair, and ashes float around him, bright against the dark sky. The second panel is smaller, a close up of the lower portion of his face, with two tears falling. Light from the ashes reflects in them. Handwritten text reads: “The world should have protected you, but you have been asked to protect it. What an honor. What an injustice.” END ID]

    (via quezycoatl)

    • 2 hours ago
    • 108202 notes
  • thepookah:

    sleuthelle:

    little-wulff:

    nesanica007:

    i cant take it anymore god made a baby lynx without any regards for proportions and i cant stop thinking about that. look at this

    image

    he feet too big for he goddamn he

    Here’s the thing: the Canadian Lynx STAYS disproportionate.

    image

    S C R E A M I N G

    (via aureateexegesis)

    • 3 hours ago
    • 178455 notes
  • phoenixonwheels:

    can-i-make-image-descriptions:

    katsdom:

    soberscientistlife:

    image

    Do Not Let HR do this to you. It is not illegal to talk about wages in the work place. I did and got a 12% raise!

    True info. Now let me add something: The power of documentation. (I was a long time steward in a nurses union.)

    Remember: The “‘E” in email stands for evidence.

    That cuts both ways. Be careful what you put into an email. It never really goes away and can be used against you.

    But can also be a powerful tool for workplace fairness.

    Case 1: Your supervisor asks you to do something you know is either illegal or against company policy. A verbal request. If things go wrong, you can count on them denying that they ever told you to do that. You go back to your desk, or wherever and you send them an email: “I just want to make sure that I understood correctly that you want me to do xxxxx” Quite often, once they see it in writing, they will change their mind about having you do it. If not, you have documentation.

    Case 2: You have a schedule you like, you’ve had that schedule for a while, it works for you. Your supervisor comes to you and says “We’re really short-handed now and I need you to change your schedule just for a month until we can get someone else hired. It’s just temporary and you can have your old schedule back after a month.” A month goes by and they forget entirely that they made that promise to you. So, once again, when they make the initial request, you send them an email “I’m happy to help out temporarily, but just want to make sure I understand correctly that I will get my old schedule back after a month as you promised.” Documentation.

    [Image ID: Text reading: In the middle of a busy clinic at our practice, I got pulled in by my manager to speak to HR, who must have made a special trip because she lives several states away, and told I was being 'investigated’ for discussing wages with my other employees. She told me it was against company policy to discuss wages.

    Me; That’s illegal.

    Them: (start italics) three slow, long seconds of staring at me blankly (end italics) Uh…

    Me: That’s an illegal policy to have. The right to discuss wages is a right protected by the National Labor Relations board. I used to be in a union. I know this.

    HR: Oh, this is news to me! I have been working HR for 18 years and I never knew that. Haha. Well try not do do it anyway, it makes people upset, haha.

    Me: people are entitled to their opinions about what their work is worth. Bye.

    I then left, and sent her several texts and emails saying I would like a copy of their company policy to see where this wage discussion policy was kept. She quickly called me back in to her office.

    HR: You know what, there is no policy like that in the handbook! I double check. Sorry about the confusion, my apologies.

    Me: You still haven’t given me the paper saying that we had this discussion. I am going to need some protection against retaliation.

    HR: Oh haha yes here you go.

    I just received a paper with legal letterhead and an apology saying there was no verbal warning or write up. Don’t even take their shit you guys. Keep talking about wages. Know your worth. /End ID]

    At one of my old (shit) jobs my boss would continually come have these verbal discussions with me and would never put anything in writing I took to summarizing every discussion we had in email. Like “just to confirm that you asked me to do X by Y date and you understand that means I won’t be able to complete the previous task you gave me until Z date - 2 weeks later than originally scheduled - because you want me to prioritize this new project.

    The woman would then storm back into my office screaming at me for putting the discussion in writing and arguing about pushing back the other project or whatever. At which point I would summarize that conversation in email as well. Which would bring her storming back in, rinse and repeat ad nauseum.

    Anyway I cannot imagine how badly that job would have gone if I hadn’t put all her wildly unreasonable demands in writing. Bitch still hated me but she could never hang me for “missing deadlines” because I always had in writing that she’d pushed the project back because she wanted something else done first.

    Paper your asses babes. Do not let them get away with shit. If they won’t put what they’re asking you to do in writing then write it up yourself and email it to them.

    (via soymikki)

    • 3 hours ago
    • 11291 notes
  • darrandennis:

    daddyfuckedme:

    image
    image

    (via soymikki)

    • 3 hours ago
    • 27800 notes
© 2011–2023 How Does Tumblr Even Work
Next page
  • Page 1 / 5037